-
About ITD
About ITD
Leveraging Technology to Improve Safety
Innovative highway technology can improve road safety and enforcement activity. Every year, cutting-edge tools increase what’s possible. Learn about how the ITD program is helping make roadways safer, and how States can apply for grant funding to implement innovative ideas.
-
Program Management
Program Management
Keeping States Aligned with ITD Goals
A State’s ITD program has many moving parts. ITD Program Managers play a critical role in making sure their State’s ITD program supports FMCSA’s mission. Learn about the different levels of ITD participation, the steps States take to be considered “Core Compliant,” and how Expanded ITD allows States to build on core capabilities.
-
ITD Data
ITD Data
Exchanging Safety Data to Enhance Safety
Securely exchanging data between State CVIEWs and FMCSA’s SAFER database is the foundation of FMCSA’s ITD program. Learn about how States exchange data with FMCSA, and with each other, and steps States can take to ensure their data is of the highest quality possible. ITD users can also log in to conduct web queries of SAFER and other FMCSA web systems.
-
Resources
Resources
Information to Help States Implement ITD
FMCSA is committed to providing States with the resources and information they need to implement effective ITD programs. Learn about the basics of the ITD program and how your State can get involved. ITD users can also log in to access recordings of previous webinars, conference materials, and web infrastructure technical specifications.
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Program Status
Below is a summary of the levels of ITD participation different States have achieved.
ITD Core Compliant States
To achieve ITD Core Compliance, States, the District of Columbia (DC) and Territories must deploy all three core elements and meet ITD certification requirements. Learn more about core compliance
The current program status is shown in the map below.
- 46 Core Compliant States
- 4 States, DC and Puerto Rico (PR) are deploying core ITD functionality
| State | E-Screening | Info Exchange | E-Credentialing |
| Alabama | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Alaska | ✓ | ✓ (IRP registration only) |
✓ |
| Arizona | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Arkansas | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| California | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Colorado | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connecticut | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Delaware | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| District of Colombia | ✓ (IRP only) |
✓ | |
| Florida | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Georgia | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hawaii | |||
| Idaho | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Illinois | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Indiana | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Iowa | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kansas | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kentucky | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Louisiana | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Maine | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Maryland | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Massachusetts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Michigan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Minnesota | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Mississippi | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Missouri | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Montana | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Nebraska | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Nevada | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| New Hampshire | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| New Jersey | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| New Mexico | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| New York | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| North Carolina | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| North Dakota | ✓ | ||
| Ohio | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Oklahoma | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Oregon | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pennsylvania | ✓ | ✓ (IRP Only) |
|
| Puerto Rico | |||
| Rhode Island | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| South Carolina | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| South Dakota | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tennessee | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Texas | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Utah | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vermont | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Virginia | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Washington | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| West Virginia | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wisconson | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wyoming | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |